<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Social Media Lies: How Social Media Enables Liars	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/</link>
	<description>Truth. Not Charm.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer Mattern		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Mattern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-252&quot;&gt;Veronica&lt;/a&gt;.

Being transparent generally is a promotional tactic, so I wouldn&#039;t separate the two. If they&#039;re doing it solely to build brand trust, than there&#039;s an underlying business goal there. That said, from the consumer perspective I still prefer to see that. I think there&#039;s a difference between promotional tactics and inappropriate promotional tactics. Being transparent is a good option in my opinion (as is good customer service or special offers that really appeal to the target buyers). So if the brand is on social media, assume they&#039;re doing it with some kind of promotional goal. If they say otherwise, they&#039;re lying. Just remember that alone isn&#039;t a reason to dismiss them. They&#039;re in business. Of course they&#039;re going to want to promote their business interests through various marketing, advertising, and PR tactics. 

I&#039;m not sure why there&#039;s an assumption that brands have to be a trend on social media to get press coverage. There are plenty of other ways to get press coverage. If a company&#039;s primary tactic for achieving that is to become a trend on Twitter or something, I&#039;d be concerned that they don&#039;t have anything better to do with their resources that would be truly newsworthy. When it comes to social media, keep the focus as much on your customers as you can. Answer their questions. Tell them things they might be curious about or interested in. Share links and resources they&#039;d find useful or amusing. Do whatever you can to give them what they want or need within the scope of what the company can handle. Don&#039;t over-promise for example if you don&#039;t have the authority to make real changes. 

If you really want press coverage and trending status on social media sites, do something newsworthy &lt;em&gt;outside&lt;/em&gt; the social media space. Then use social media tools to help spread the word. 

My $.02.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-252">Veronica</a>.</p>
<p>Being transparent generally is a promotional tactic, so I wouldn&#8217;t separate the two. If they&#8217;re doing it solely to build brand trust, than there&#8217;s an underlying business goal there. That said, from the consumer perspective I still prefer to see that. I think there&#8217;s a difference between promotional tactics and inappropriate promotional tactics. Being transparent is a good option in my opinion (as is good customer service or special offers that really appeal to the target buyers). So if the brand is on social media, assume they&#8217;re doing it with some kind of promotional goal. If they say otherwise, they&#8217;re lying. Just remember that alone isn&#8217;t a reason to dismiss them. They&#8217;re in business. Of course they&#8217;re going to want to promote their business interests through various marketing, advertising, and PR tactics. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why there&#8217;s an assumption that brands have to be a trend on social media to get press coverage. There are plenty of other ways to get press coverage. If a company&#8217;s primary tactic for achieving that is to become a trend on Twitter or something, I&#8217;d be concerned that they don&#8217;t have anything better to do with their resources that would be truly newsworthy. When it comes to social media, keep the focus as much on your customers as you can. Answer their questions. Tell them things they might be curious about or interested in. Share links and resources they&#8217;d find useful or amusing. Do whatever you can to give them what they want or need within the scope of what the company can handle. Don&#8217;t over-promise for example if you don&#8217;t have the authority to make real changes. </p>
<p>If you really want press coverage and trending status on social media sites, do something newsworthy <em>outside</em> the social media space. Then use social media tools to help spread the word. </p>
<p>My $.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Veronica		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-252</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veronica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I totally agree with this perspective. Just recently, I was thinking about how social media could potentially be the scene for spinning and astro-turfing. We have seen some examples already of how companies have been caught. Now companies learned from those mistakes. 

It is apparent that companies do need to have a presence on social media, but how can a person determine that everything that is supposed to be transparent is not promotional? If a brand needs to be a trend on social media in order for it to be considered for press coverage, then how does a brand get to that point without resorting to extreme measures?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with this perspective. Just recently, I was thinking about how social media could potentially be the scene for spinning and astro-turfing. We have seen some examples already of how companies have been caught. Now companies learned from those mistakes. </p>
<p>It is apparent that companies do need to have a presence on social media, but how can a person determine that everything that is supposed to be transparent is not promotional? If a brand needs to be a trend on social media in order for it to be considered for press coverage, then how does a brand get to that point without resorting to extreme measures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have to agree that it&#039;s very easy for people to get away with lies on social media sites. With more and more people relying on social media and trusting complete strangers with information it&#039;s only a matter of time before something bad might happen. Imagine trusting someone online that they might find you a new job or something that might very much affect you, then to be let down and realize you were simply being naive? People need to be careful with who they trust on social media sites, it&#039;s too open right now as far as I am concerned.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that it&#8217;s very easy for people to get away with lies on social media sites. With more and more people relying on social media and trusting complete strangers with information it&#8217;s only a matter of time before something bad might happen. Imagine trusting someone online that they might find you a new job or something that might very much affect you, then to be let down and realize you were simply being naive? People need to be careful with who they trust on social media sites, it&#8217;s too open right now as far as I am concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rachel		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rachel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This lying stuff really irks me.  IDK why people see negative comments are such a bad thing where they have to delete them.  Honestly, if your points were clear and you are confident, a negative comment really should not be the death of you.  Disagreements lead to discussion which I think makes you even more credible.  Also, if you are wrong, wouldn&#039;t you look more respectable if you correct yourself? Deleting neg pertinent comments does not make sense.

Don&#039;t get me started on false credentials.  I got my BS in nutrition and you don&#039;t have any idea how much bologna I see when it comes to exercise and nutrition gurus.  People who actually know about the field knows that the person probably never lifted a  weight in their life or have some backwards logic when it comes to nutrition.  Too bad  these &quot;gurus&quot; claim all of this success and credential to take advantage of a public who is trying to live healthy lives.

Great article! Way to call the phonies out! =)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lying stuff really irks me.  IDK why people see negative comments are such a bad thing where they have to delete them.  Honestly, if your points were clear and you are confident, a negative comment really should not be the death of you.  Disagreements lead to discussion which I think makes you even more credible.  Also, if you are wrong, wouldn&#8217;t you look more respectable if you correct yourself? Deleting neg pertinent comments does not make sense.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on false credentials.  I got my BS in nutrition and you don&#8217;t have any idea how much bologna I see when it comes to exercise and nutrition gurus.  People who actually know about the field knows that the person probably never lifted a  weight in their life or have some backwards logic when it comes to nutrition.  Too bad  these &#8220;gurus&#8221; claim all of this success and credential to take advantage of a public who is trying to live healthy lives.</p>
<p>Great article! Way to call the phonies out! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gail Gardner		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gail Gardner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There have been liars throughout history and there will always be liars - especially now that the media and schools have conditioned people to believe dishonesty is a virtue as long as you don&#039;t get caught. 

The bottom line is that we can not protect the naive from being fleeced. Most people will not throw off their conditioning and quit believing what they read and are told and taught no matter how much proof you can show them about what the real truth is. 

On top of that, there is so much manufactured &quot;proof&quot; that even wise people can not always determine what is true and what is lies. Being widely believed does NOT make something true. Most people once thought the world was flat and the sun revolved around the earth - their believing did not change the truth. 

The Internet does make it easier for the few who have discernment to find each other and share what we know. It speeds up the process of discovery and enables brainstorming to decide where the truth really lies. And it allows us to share what we believe for others to find. (Best not to offer what you know to people directly - they will only think you&#039;re crazy for objecting to the insanity selfishness, love of money and greed engenders.)

My advice is develop discernment for yourself and share it with those whose minds are open to it, but give up trying to save the masses. They are NOT going to listen. (Does this remind anyone of scenes from the movie The Matrix - it should.) Insights are often shared in fiction for those who will pick up on them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been liars throughout history and there will always be liars &#8211; especially now that the media and schools have conditioned people to believe dishonesty is a virtue as long as you don&#8217;t get caught. </p>
<p>The bottom line is that we can not protect the naive from being fleeced. Most people will not throw off their conditioning and quit believing what they read and are told and taught no matter how much proof you can show them about what the real truth is. </p>
<p>On top of that, there is so much manufactured &#8220;proof&#8221; that even wise people can not always determine what is true and what is lies. Being widely believed does NOT make something true. Most people once thought the world was flat and the sun revolved around the earth &#8211; their believing did not change the truth. </p>
<p>The Internet does make it easier for the few who have discernment to find each other and share what we know. It speeds up the process of discovery and enables brainstorming to decide where the truth really lies. And it allows us to share what we believe for others to find. (Best not to offer what you know to people directly &#8211; they will only think you&#8217;re crazy for objecting to the insanity selfishness, love of money and greed engenders.)</p>
<p>My advice is develop discernment for yourself and share it with those whose minds are open to it, but give up trying to save the masses. They are NOT going to listen. (Does this remind anyone of scenes from the movie The Matrix &#8211; it should.) Insights are often shared in fiction for those who will pick up on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Allison		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It supports liars. It supports and displays many human flaws. Online it&#039;s much easier to be who you want to be when in reality you are not. Once a friend added me on myspace under a false identity. Then on facebook an ex&#039;s friend &#039;friended&#039; me so my ex could just see what I was up to. This is why I don&#039;t like social networking sites (facebook, twitter and myspace) Sure they could be a great community where people all over the world share innovative ideas that can make our world a better place but it&#039;s not. Instead it&#039;s a platform for the shallow, shameless and dumb to share their most trivial and stupid thoughts such as, &quot;Eating a bowl of rice&quot; &quot;Going to the supermarket&quot;  &quot;I just found out my cat is a boy&quot;  It puzzles me,...wasn&#039;t the internet meant to make us more connected, smarter and evolved? Instead it&#039;s pointing out our biggest human flaws such as insecurity, narcissism, and ego. We are not more connected to each other. We only becoming more dependent on our computers and the sigh of relief once you log into your (life) twitter account.  The persona you have online is always the one you wish you had in reality.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It supports liars. It supports and displays many human flaws. Online it&#8217;s much easier to be who you want to be when in reality you are not. Once a friend added me on myspace under a false identity. Then on facebook an ex&#8217;s friend &#8216;friended&#8217; me so my ex could just see what I was up to. This is why I don&#8217;t like social networking sites (facebook, twitter and myspace) Sure they could be a great community where people all over the world share innovative ideas that can make our world a better place but it&#8217;s not. Instead it&#8217;s a platform for the shallow, shameless and dumb to share their most trivial and stupid thoughts such as, &#8220;Eating a bowl of rice&#8221; &#8220;Going to the supermarket&#8221;  &#8220;I just found out my cat is a boy&#8221;  It puzzles me,&#8230;wasn&#8217;t the internet meant to make us more connected, smarter and evolved? Instead it&#8217;s pointing out our biggest human flaws such as insecurity, narcissism, and ego. We are not more connected to each other. We only becoming more dependent on our computers and the sigh of relief once you log into your (life) twitter account.  The persona you have online is always the one you wish you had in reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rianne		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rianne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more, every body can be &quot;somebody&quot; in the social media world and it&#039;s a common place for scums.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, every body can be &#8220;somebody&#8221; in the social media world and it&#8217;s a common place for scums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cathy Miller		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cathy Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-243&quot;&gt;becky&lt;/a&gt;.

@Becky-I&#039;ll have to take up that challenge-I&#039;ll let you know how it works out. :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-243">becky</a>.</p>
<p>@Becky-I&#8217;ll have to take up that challenge-I&#8217;ll let you know how it works out. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer Mattern		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Mattern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-244&quot;&gt;Mary&lt;/a&gt;.

I could see it taking a lot of energy if they actually tried to keep up with their lies. But sometimes they don&#039;t even bother doing that much. That&#039;s how the fake-degree-girl got caught. And that was among other lies exposed on Hoy&#039;s site (lies to her own contractors she sub-contracted work to). It was just crazy. And I know from other writers that same person not only publicly claimed to be incredibly successful, but they then went around asking colleagues for money because they couldn&#039;t pay their bills. I&#039;ll never understand the thought-process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-244">Mary</a>.</p>
<p>I could see it taking a lot of energy if they actually tried to keep up with their lies. But sometimes they don&#8217;t even bother doing that much. That&#8217;s how the fake-degree-girl got caught. And that was among other lies exposed on Hoy&#8217;s site (lies to her own contractors she sub-contracted work to). It was just crazy. And I know from other writers that same person not only publicly claimed to be incredibly successful, but they then went around asking colleagues for money because they couldn&#8217;t pay their bills. I&#8217;ll never understand the thought-process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary		</title>
		<link>https://nakedpr.com/social-media-lies/#comment-244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialrealist.com/?p=430#comment-244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve got me so curious. I&#039;ve often wondered how some folks could be so &quot;successful&quot; when it&#039;s apparent their skills are not there. Though I always maintain a bit of skepticism, I never really considered just how far some people would go to make themselves look good. I don&#039;t have that much energy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got me so curious. I&#8217;ve often wondered how some folks could be so &#8220;successful&#8221; when it&#8217;s apparent their skills are not there. Though I always maintain a bit of skepticism, I never really considered just how far some people would go to make themselves look good. I don&#8217;t have that much energy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
